I would like to propose that the 2.5* Gtk version be kept functional alongside 2.6* going forward. Is that even a remote possibility? PLEASE?!!
The silence is deafening . . .
http://avidemux.org/smuf/index.php/topic,16356.msg71950.html#msg71950
QuoteRelease Date: Sep 11, 2012:
Avidemux is now time-based instead of frame-based to provide better accuracy when dealing with variable frame rate sources
source: AviDemux -> Version History (http://www.digital-digest.com/software/avidemux_history.html#26)
:((( All that is so very,very sad . . .
Time to start looking at other video editors . . .
@ golinux
Just curious as to your reason's for wanting a deprecated version of ADM on top of a deprecated/abandoned GUI for it.
I run V2.5 alongside V2.6 to give me the choice of editing with a frame based or time based model.
If I want fancier editing with older video codecs - I go for V2.5.
If I want to edit with current video codecs - Only V2.6 can do it properly.
Looking at other video editors will most likely point you to expensive commercial video editors.