Avidemux Forum

Avidemux => Stable branch (2.5) discussion => Topic started by: JW28 on October 26, 2012, 12:39:42 PM

Title: AVI automatic splits
Post by: JW28 on October 26, 2012, 12:39:42 PM
Hello,

I am in the process of mounting a number of old HI8 video tapes done some years ago. After the digitalization process I have on my PC an avi file which I want to clean-up cutting all the noisy sequences, and for doing this I have discovered Avidemux which I find outstanding for doing the job and splitting into several smaller, clean avi files which I will later be able to mount with another software (I am using Studio 16 from Corel).

I have a question though related to the automatic split of the video produced every 4188 Mb. Why is this done ? Can I configure that avi is never split ? I see the config button which shows this
(https://avidemux.org/smif/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi46.servimg.com%2Fu%2Ff46%2F11%2F56%2F72%2F05%2Fprints19.jpg&hash=81df86a428c81a6ba82c3a6757425c432837e9a6) (http://www.servimg.com/image_preview.php?i=234&u=11567205)

Nota that I run Win7/64b and I would have thought that the file size limitation of 4 Gb would not apply.

Thank you for your help.
Title: Re: AVI automatic splits
Post by: styrol on October 26, 2012, 07:59:59 PM
QuoteI have a question though related to the automatic split of the video produced every 4188 Mb. Why is this done ? Can I configure that avi is never split?
It's due to limitations of the FAT-32 file system which only handles files of max. 4GB size. Try setting a higher value, e.g. 10000MB.
Title: Re: AVI automatic splits
Post by: thany on December 09, 2012, 02:46:32 AM
I don't mean to be rude, but FAT32 has been dead for a long time. But even so, if my computer contains not a single FAT32 volume, why is this limit still the default? It just makes no sense. On linux, the limit is even stranger, since FAT32 has never been a primary FS there...

And why is this limitation not on other containers? At least make it consistent...

Do I hear SD-cards that go into tablets? Sure, here's the solution that also has been around for a couple of years: exFAT.

Plenty of reasons to remove this silly (default) limit, I'd say ;)