Author Topic: Suggestion: VP9/WebM decoding?  (Read 1719 times)

douche

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Suggestion: VP9/WebM decoding?
« on: November 25, 2014, 09:23:50 PM »
Seeing how VP8/WebM decoding is already supported, surely it isn't blasphemous to suggest support for decoding VP9...

jolo100

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Suggestion: VP9/WebM decoding?
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2016, 01:23:03 AM »
Great suggestion, I have been stuck trying to encode to webm.

Do you have a suggestion for another product that might work with webm? I would love if Avidemux or I could add it.

Jon

Newrone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Suggestion: VP9/WebM decoding?
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2018, 12:11:03 AM »
Decoding, yes. Encoding in WebM is a waste of time.
Even in Adobe, rendering in WebM requires a separate plugin* & still takes x20 times longer than MP4, so that fact & the general absence of renderers elsewhere suggests to me that its days are numbered.
I'm already telling clients I don't do WebM as it's not worth it for them. (One job that the client wants next day, according to tests, would take over 6 days continuous rendering in WebM.  :o)
*http://www.fnordware.com/WebM/