Author Topic: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)  (Read 5178 times)

zakk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 623
Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« on: October 29, 2012, 08:54:55 AM »
Hi, I just want to say that I have to stick with r8195, because any update I tried after that bugs. I copy DVB h264+eac3/mp2 to mkv, the process seems to be ok but output is bugged (Avidemux say e.g. 4GB written but outpout is only 2GB and buggy).

presler

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2012, 09:05:32 AM »
What does it mean "buggy"?

Jan Gruuthuse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6060
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2012, 09:15:03 AM »
From both origins nightly or grunster?
Quote
Revision 8195 - Directory Listing
 Modified Tue Sep 25 06:13:44 2012 UTC (4 weeks, 6 days ago) by gruntster
[ffmpeg] upgrade ffmpeg to 0.11.2

zakk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 623
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2012, 09:23:08 AM »
What does it mean "buggy"?
It means VLC player crashing/unable to navigate.

From both origins nightly or grunster?
nighlty

Anyway I don't intend to investigate this because r8195 does eveything I need, it's just an information  ;D

Jan Gruuthuse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6060
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2012, 10:16:29 AM »
OK, so 8195 is not posing that issue. If you still remember if it started with 8196 or8197
Quote
Revision 8196 - Directory Listing
 Modified Wed Sep 26 04:25:10 2012 UTC (4 weeks, 5 days ago) by gruntster
[mswin] update build scripts
Revision 8197 - Directory Listing
 Modified Tue Oct 9 05:42:04 2012 UTC (2 weeks, 6 days ago) by mean
[ffmpeg] Update to 1.0.0

mean

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10971
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2012, 10:27:02 AM »
Probably a side effect of the ffmpeg upgrade
On windows ?

zakk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 623
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2012, 11:42:21 AM »
Well, if someone can give me a link for the first new ffmpeg revision, I can give it a try tonight, after all  ;D

Jan Gruuthuse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6060
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2012, 12:42:05 PM »

zakk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 623
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2012, 01:22:36 PM »
So the first version with ffmpeg update I can download would be r8209, right ?

Jan Gruuthuse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6060
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2012, 02:05:15 PM »
Here you can find what was the main change for each revision:
Next build 8266 tomorrow or the next release after 8266, would perhaps have a fix or been build correctly? If I understood mean correctly?
As soon as i fix the build bot :)
« Last Edit: October 29, 2012, 02:07:14 PM by Jan Gruuthuse »

mean

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10971
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #10 on: October 30, 2012, 06:25:30 AM »
Can you provide a sample that shows the problem ?
I tried with a very short TF1HD recording and it seemed allright

zakk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 623
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2012, 11:04:39 AM »
Il faut un bout avec la partie buguée ?

mean

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10971
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2012, 08:30:30 PM »
Un bout de la source qui se convertit en mkv illisible oui

zakk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 623
Re: Regression since r8195 (for me anyway)
« Reply #13 on: October 31, 2012, 11:01:06 AM »
Je posterai à mon prochain bug car je n'ai plus la source.
Au cas où un échantillon de mon type de flux:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/4xzd3q
Merci.