Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
Main version 2.6 / Re: Articfacts and Stuttering Frames
« Last post by Jan Gruuthuse on April 24, 2017, 06:21:42 AM »
Why would you get into trouble?

Clip? Is this cutting video in [Copy] mode for both video and audio output?
You do select the editing points with keyboard up/down arrow only? or
Don't use the keyboard left or right arrow key. or
New codecs don't use frames as in the old days (avidemux 2.5 branch)!

small YouTube demo: Fast Edit with Copy Mode
92
Main version 2.6 / Articfacts and Stuttering Frames
« Last post by Maveriick on April 24, 2017, 06:09:25 AM »
I am still struggling with editing MKVs.  It seems like over half the time I clip some footage from an MKV I am left with artifacts, frames that don't change or stuttering frames.  It is always the video and not the audio.  I really hope this question doesn't get me in some sort of trouble because I do plan to continue to use avidemux, but are there alternatives that I can tryout to compare performance?  Free is not a requirement.  I am happy to pay for it.  Again, I just want to compare results.

I am trying each nightly build Windows 64 bit build running on Windows 7.
93
0dccaa5            [helper scripts] Try to make bootStrapCrossMingwQt5_mxe.sh a one-fits-all solution
6925c10            [build] ignore ChangeLog.html
a428952            [helper scripts] Bring the new cross-compilation script back from the attic

ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS 64 bit x86 SMP, QT5, x265 version 1.9: avidemux 2.7.0 170424-64bit Xenial with x265 version 1.9
94
Windows / Re: Main Tool Bar Missing Almost Every Button
« Last post by p3trus on April 23, 2017, 11:02:19 PM »
...reordering per drag'n'drop...
That would be the finest solution indeed (and that was my first try, using drag & drop, so I guess it's somewhat intuitive ;) )
Thanks & good luck for investigating!
95
Windows / Re: Main Tool Bar Missing Almost Every Button
« Last post by eumagga0x2a on April 23, 2017, 09:11:36 PM »
adding a filter and moving that one to top of other existing filters - with the buttons, you could simply keep clicking the 'move filter up' button, now you have to right-click the filter, chose 'move up', move the mouse to the new position of the filter, right-click ... if you have set up a complex filter chain and find out that you'll need a deinterlacer first, that's a quite annoying method to move the filter up for some half a dozen positions.

Not working reordering per drag'n'drop in the active filter list is a bug to be investigated (on my todo list) and hopefully fixed. Moving a filter to the top should be as simple as dragging it there with the mouse.
96
Main version 2.6 / Re: With latest nightly, I cannot add a png file to video
« Last post by eumagga0x2a on April 23, 2017, 09:00:59 PM »
Checked linux QT5 2.6.17:
Video Output: [Copy] = Filters is grayed out, not selectable
same on 2.6.15 app

You're absolutely right, MainWindow::comboChanged function took care of that since ages. Nevertheless, I've pushed a small patch which tweaks enabling and disabling codec widget controls a bit.
97
Windows / Re: jobs queue / slave mechanism broken?
« Last post by p3trus on April 23, 2017, 02:38:34 PM »
No, all files (ADM / source / destination) are on local HDDs.
98
Windows / Re: jobs queue / slave mechanism broken?
« Last post by mean on April 23, 2017, 02:33:28 PM »
are you reading over a network ?
99
Windows / Re: Main Tool Bar Missing Almost Every Button
« Last post by p3trus on April 23, 2017, 02:10:35 PM »
No, it's normal
the UI has been simplified a few versions back
'Simplified' might not be the right term - some functions (eg the bitrate calculator or the additional preview modes allowing still frame comparison amongst other advantages) were simply removed;
other actions got quite more complicated (eg adding a filter and moving that one to top of other existing filters - with the buttons, you could simply keep clicking the 'move filter up' button, now you have to right-click the filter, chose 'move up', move the mouse to the new position of the filter, right-click ... if you have set up a complex filter chain and find out that you'll need a deinterlacer first, that's a quite annoying method to move the filter up for some half a dozen positions).
100
Documentation & Tips / Re: Only with filters that
« Last post by p3trus on April 23, 2017, 01:54:29 PM »
Only with filters that :
* ..
* Dont need several frames (e.g. deinterlacer)
That's quite a bad change compared to the 2.5 branch - I process a lot of movies recorded on TV, and quite often those have 'sped up' end credits, having only those interlaced - now I have to deinterlace the whole video instead of only the last 1-2%.
Although it doesn't 'hurt' the non-interlaced part, it's unneccessary filter processing being applied to the huge main part of the video.

What's the technical difference between deinterlacing of the whole video from frame 0 to End (I don't have a frame -1 and End+1 there...) and processing only frame A (>0) to End?
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]